By far the most informative, well-documented critique on psychiatric drugs that I’ve come across is Grace Jackson’s ” Rethinking Psychiatric Drugs: A Guide for Informed Consent
In 2004, an on-line medical newsletter posted an article with a captivating title: “All the Things They Taught Us That Were Wrong.” Penned by an academic psychiatrist who completed his post-graduate training nearly two decades before my own, the essay resonated with my own discoveries during residency and beyond. Probably, like him, my patient care and research experiences transformed me until I, too, developed the painful awareness of “all the things my teachers taught me” which proved to be untrue.This book is the culmination of many of those discoveries. It is the result of a five-year (and continuing) process of corrective self-education. It is the philosophically, epidemiologically, and scientifically supported revelation of how and why clinicians have often failed their mental health patients, partly because the information upon which they have relied (Evidence Based Medicine) has become increasingly unreliable. This development, along with many more, has compromised the ability of physicians and patients to participate in the construction of viable, informed consents to care:
“Informed consent…is about the right to make choices and the right to refuse consent; it is about the right of individuals to preserve their integrity and dignity whatever physical and mental deterioration they may suffer through ill health; it is about our duty always and in all circumstances to respect each other as fellow human beings and as persons.”
“The chapters which follow are intended to facilitate the shared decision making of consumers and health care providers. First, the public’s opinion about psychiatric drugs is explored through research conducted in several countries. Next, the sources of professional opinion are reviewed, beginning with the drug development process and the philosophy of Evidence Based Medicine. Chapter four explains the gold standard of medical research–the Randomized Controlled Trial–along with an emphasis upon the methodological deficiencies which commonly distort the value of drug treatments. Chapter five is an overview of the human brain. This is offered for the reader who desires a more detailed understanding of the targets of psychiatric drugs in terms of their chemical and structural effects. Chapter six introduces the concept of allostatic load–a phenomena of maladaptive changes made by the body in response to stimuli, such as medication. The chapter includes discussions of tolerance (an important mechanism of decreasing responsitivity to treatment over time) and drug discontinuation syndromes (withdrawal and rebound). It presents the concept of sensitization of a possible explanation for the phenomenon through which the pharmacological therapies may effect a progressive worsening or prolongation of initial symptoms.
At the heart of the book is a detailed examination of three major classes of psychiatric drugs: antidepressants, antipsychotics, and stimulants (the latter given for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). The history of each drug class is reviewed. A neuroscience section explains contemporary hypothesis about presumed mechanisms of action. A special emphasis is placed upon the topics of drug effectiveness and safety, including long term effects, uncommonly acknowledged dangers, and alternatives to medication. The book closes with a discussion of the current crises in psychiatric research and practice, particularly as these problems continue to undermine the capacity of physicians and patients to collaborate in authentically informed decisions about health care.”
This book is accessible to both the professional and lay person. If you have any question about some of the undocumented assertions I make about psychiatric drugs on this blog, this book will back up what I say with science. Where I use personal experience, this book uses science and clinical experience.