More proof of psychiatry’s corruption

Nothing new for most of us who read this blog, but maybe it will catch the eye of someone who’s not heard of this crap before.

From Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report

Most of the psychiatrists on the American Psychiatric Association panels who wrote the newest clinical guidelines for how to treat depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia had financial ties to drug companies, according to a study by Boston researchers scheduled to be published this month in the journal Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, the Boston Globe reports.

For the study, Lisa Cosgrove of the University of Massachusetts-Boston and colleagues, including Sheldon Krimsky of Tufts University and Harold Bursztajn of Harvard Medical School, searched publicly accessible databases such as Medline and the records of the federal patent office to identify financial ties. According to the study, 18 of the 20 authors of the guidelines had at least one financial tie to drug companies. Twelve authors had ties in at least three categories, such as consulting, research grants, speaking fees or stock ownership, the study found. In addition, the study found that all of the authors of schizophrenia and bipolar guidelines had relationships with the drug industry, while 60% of the authors of the depression guidelines had such connections. According to the study, more than 75% of the authors received funding for research from drug companies. In addition, one-third of the authors served on the speakers’ bureaus of drug companies, the study shows.

The study authors wrote that the guidelines focus heavily on medications and give little focus to nondrug treatments. The guidelines also do not focus on the time and process of removing mentally ill patients from prescription drugs, the study found. Three common diagnoses result in around $25 billion in drug sales annually, according to the study. (emphasis mine)

The psychiatric association now requires psychiatrists who write guidelines to publish their financial ties to drug companies, but the rule did not exist when the current guidelines for depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were published in 2004 and 2005. (read the rest)

If this sort of stuff is news to you I highly recommend you read the comments at the end of this piece that is linked to above.

2 thoughts on “More proof of psychiatry’s corruption

Add yours

  1. “The guidelines also do not focus on the time and process of removing mentally ill patients from prescription drugs, the study found.”

    More loopy logic from the mad men of medicine..

    If you don’t need their dwugs, surely you ain’t a “mentally ill patient” after all..

    It’s very telling how the psycho-drug industry uses the term “mentally ill”.. It’s a term of derision.. like calling someone a thief or a rapist..

    And it’s a label for life.. Once they’ve labelled you up as mentally ill, you always will be mentally ill… You can’t stop being mentally ill. That’s not an option..

    It’s a clever ruse from the psycho-drug industry… It’s the Hegelian Dialectic at work… Problem-Reaction-Solution…

    The Industry sows fear of the “mentally ill”.. (the problem).

    The public demands draconian powers to ensure “patient compliance”.. (the reaction)

    The lily-livered legislature rolls over and signs the law and the psycho-drug Industry and Wall Street laughs all the way to the bank… (the solution)

  2. One thing we, as individuals, need to remember is that most times others do not necessarily have our best interests at heart. Even though we may expect someone, say a doctor, to be doing what is in the patients best interest that may not be the case.

    The only real answer we can find is to educate ourselves and determine the best course of action for us based on all information available.

Leave a Reply

Powered by

Up ↑